Firm Review, discussed firm by firm.
If you want a Review for yourself, that path is /connect. Your first Review is on us after sign-in. Terms are set in the context of the workflow being reviewed, the responsible team, the expected volume, and how the record is kept.
Design-partner terms are discussed firm by firm.
Teranode is opening a small number of conversations with firms that already have a person responsible for the decision. A first discussion identifies the write-up being reviewed, who reviews the output, what information may be submitted, and how the firm expects to retain the resulting record.
Founding pilot: 60 days, one flat fee, credited in full toward year one if you continue. The fee is set on a 20-minute call. Nothing here is an offer, commitment, or representation that the product is appropriate for a particular firm.
What determines the scope.
- Workflow. The type of AI-generated or human-authored write-up the firm wants reviewed.
- Reviewers. The people responsible for dispositions and final decisions.
- Volume. The expected number and cadence of reviews.
- Records. Archive, export, retention, and retrieval requirements.
- Firm controls. Authentication, vendor diligence, data, and contracting requirements.
The software does not decide.
Findings inform the person. The person decides. Teranode does not replace a firm's supervisory or recordkeeping systems. The consumer first Review lives on /connect and works the same way: findings for a person who decides.
Bring one review workflow.
The first call is twenty minutes. No client data is needed. Use a synthetic example to determine whether the review structure and resulting record fit the firm's process.
Consumer path: /connect. Also: Start a Review, method, and trust disclosures.