Firm Review, discussed firm by firm.
If you want a Review for yourself, that path is /connect. Your first Review is on us after sign-in. This page is the firm lane: terms are set in the context of the workflow being reviewed, the responsible team, the expected volume, and how the record is kept.
Design-partner terms are discussed firm by firm.
Teranode is opening a small number of conversations with firms that already have a person responsible for the decision. A first discussion identifies the write-up being reviewed, who reviews the output, what information may be submitted, and how the firm expects to retain the resulting record.
No public firm price is quoted on this page. Nothing here is an offer, commitment, or representation that the product is appropriate for a particular firm.
What determines the scope.
- Workflow. The type of AI-generated or human-authored write-up the firm wants reviewed.
- Reviewers. The people responsible for dispositions and final decisions.
- Volume. The expected number and cadence of reviews.
- Records. Archive, export, retention, and retrieval requirements.
- Firm controls. Authentication, vendor diligence, data, and contracting requirements.
The software does not decide.
Findings inform the person. The person decides. Teranode does not replace a firm's supervisory or recordkeeping systems. The consumer first Review lives on /connect and works the same way: findings for a person who decides.
Bring one review workflow.
The first call is twenty minutes. No client data is needed. Use a synthetic example to determine whether the review structure and resulting record fit the firm's process.
Consumer path: /connect. Also the product workbench, method, and trust disclosures.