Review the AI answer. Record the human decision.
Teranode reviews an AI-generated recommendation using models from other vendors, flags what a qualified person should examine, and produces the reviewer-attested, timestamped record of the human decision.
Self-review is not a separate control.
A model can critique its own answer and repeat the same assumptions. Teranode excludes the source vendor before assigning reviewers.
Four lenses across at least three other vendors.
Evidence, fiduciary and conflicts, risk and suitability, and alternatives lenses return attributed, flag-form findings. Strict schemas, fail-closed completion, and deterministic aggregation keep the model boundary explicit. No single AI makes the final call.
Every finding receives a human disposition.
The reviewer accepts, mitigates, overrides, or marks each finding not applicable and records the basis. The final decision remains human and must be consistent with the recorded dispositions.
A reviewer-attested, timestamped decision/review record.
The record preserves source and reviewer provenance, findings, limitations, dispositions, reviewer identity, final decision, timestamp, filing status, and a content-comparison fingerprint. The SHA-256 fingerprint is a comparison value, not a digital signature.
Finance first. Design partners now.
Teranode Review is currently designed for RIA compliance workflows. The next product evidence is an accountable firm workflow and an identified reviewer, not an unsupervised public decision tool.