Step inside the data.
The Chairman is the gravitational center. Four reasoner roles orbit it. Their pinned models are moons. Every eval run is an asteroid in the belt — brighter when it's recent, fading when it's deep history. Three perspectives — same system, different angles — and a time scrubber that lets you replay how the graph compounded to today.
How the Council works — in 5 simple steps
- 1
You ask a question.
The Council reads your question — just like you'd write a text to a smart friend.
- 2
Five thinkers see it at the same time.
The question goes to 5 different AI models all at once. They don't talk to each other.
- 3
Each thinker does their job.
Risk
asks "what could go wrong?"
Builder
writes the plan
Strategist
sees the long game
Contrarian
argues the other side - 4
The Chairman puts it all together.
A fifth thinker, the Chairman, reads what the four said and writes one decision. Where the models disagree, the disagreement is preserved in the record.
- 5
You get a timestamped, tamper-evident decision record.
One artifact you can save, share, or file. With every thinker's voice on it — including the one who disagreed. Cryptographically timestamped so the record can't be quietly rewritten later.
Composing the system — frontier models, eval history, scenario field…
Live activity · what the system is doing
Anonymous structural telemetry from every deliberation — tier, domain, duration, whether the cross-examination round fired, whether the FINRA-examiner found a gap. No scenario text, no client data, no outputs. The reliability graph grows with every run. How we use this.
- Quick00.0%
- Standard8072%
- FINRA Battle-Tested3128%
The graph records every decision and every outcome.
Every Decision an external system asks the Council for — and every Outcome that comes back — lands in the same graph. Connected domains are anonymized pre-design-partner go-live (client-confidentiality posture); what crosses the wire is structure, not product detail. Reliability patterns will transfer between domains once enough outcomes accumulate to compute them.
How to read this map
The bright center
The Chairman — the thinker that makes the final call.
The four orbiting planets
The four other thinkers — Risk, Builder, Strategist, Contrarian. Each runs on a different AI model.
The little moons
The actual AI models each thinker uses. Different brand for every role — no all-eggs-in-one-basket.
The asteroid belt
Every real Council run we've evaluated. Brighter dots are recent; fading dots are older.
Distant stars
Real questions the Council has answered. Click one to watch the Council think in real time.
Constellations
Groups of AI brands (Anthropic, OpenAI, Google, DeepSeek). Shows we don't lean on any one company.
Outer satellites
Each connected domain the Council serves. Active ones pulse copper; queued ones hold dim. Anonymized by design — the graph is the substrate, not a list of products.
Try a real question through the Council
Hypothetical examples for illustration of the Council's reasoning process. Not investment advice, not recommendations, and not based on actual client communications. Teranode does not provide investment advice. Past results of the Council's analysis do not predict future outcomes.
My brother-in-law is selling me on a 'sure thing' real estate deal in his syndicate. He shows me spreadsheets. Should I write the check?
Try this →Tax · the letter you've been ignoringI owe the IRS $31k from a side business I ran in 2024. They sent a letter. I've been ignoring it for two months. What's the actual worst case?
Try this →Major life · career & familyMy wife wants to move to Italy for her dream job. We have $200k saved and a 4-year-old. Can we do it?
Try this →Aging parents · suspicious advisorMy mom is 71, has $380k in a CD ladder, and just told me a 'financial advisor' from her church wants her to move it into an annuity. I don't trust this. What do I actually ask?
Try this →College in 18 months · big gapMy oldest starts college in 18 months. We have $42k saved, tuition is $89k/year. I keep wondering if I should just take a bigger swing in my brokerage account. Talk me down or don't.
Try this →Why we put it in orbit.
A 2D graph reads as “Obsidian-default” — generic mind-map syntax. The Council's reliability story is not generic; it's the architecture itself, and its motion is the moat.
Every eval run is a real head-to-head we ran in production and judged on the record. The asteroid belt is what we have today. Drag the time scrubber back and you're replaying the sequence we lived through to get here. Drag it forward and the next dot is the next thing we ship.
The three perspectives are not just camera positions — they're lenses. Architect sees the design. Analyst sees the validation activity. Witness sits inside one role and looks outward. The Witness lens carries one line worth keeping: what you see depends on where you stand. The data is the same.
policy_version · 2026-05-09 · earliest eval ·