teranodeMethodology log

Weekly pulse · Jul 1 – Jul 8, 2026.

Auto-published from anonymous structural telemetry. Every Council run, every script eval, every analysis the system performs adds one row regardless of opt-in: no scenario text, no client data, no outputs. The reliability graph at /reliability-graph shows this data live; this page is the weekly digest.

01

Deliberations this week.

93deliberations · last 7 days
596deliberations · all-time
69A/B eval comparisons · all-time
19Jul 0216Jul 032Jul 042Jul 0518Jul 0619Jul 0717Jul 08
02

Tier distribution.

Three user-selectable tiers: Quick (~15s), Standard (~45s), Exam-Tested (up to 3 min). The split shows what depth of review visitors are choosing.

  • Quick: 0 runs
  • Standard: 0 runs
  • Exam-Tested: 0 runs
  • No tier specified (legacy callers): 93
03

Engine-path activity.

Cross-examination fire rate: 0.0% over 14 eligible runs this week. The chairman flags requires_cross_examination = true only when the dissent introduces a factor not already addressed in the synthesis. A low fire rate means the chairman's first-pass synthesis is already calibrated; a high rate means the second round is doing real work.

SEC RIA examiner gap rate: 35.7% over 14 examiner runs this week. The examiner reviews each chairman synthesis for IAA §206 / Marketing Rule 206(4)-1 / DOL PTE 2020-02 / SEC 2026 Exam Priorities failure modes (Reg BI / FINRA 2111 for broker-side recommendations). A 0% gap rate combined with the examiner-validation harness's 6/6 catch rate on synthetic violations indicates the chairman is producing artifacts that don't trip the examiner. The verification stamp is the buyer-facing feature, not a quality gate that catches misbehavior.

04

Sources.

Where the deliberations came from. Each source distinguishes real-user activity from script-eval / admin-eval activity so the graph reads honestly.

  • anotb_radar: 76 runs
  • eval_canary: 14 runs
  • prism_mcp: 3 runs
05

What this means.

This page is a transparency artifact, not a marketing instrument. The numbers are what the system actually did this week. The reliability graph at /reliability-graph visualizes the same data live. The /methodology page describes how the engine works architecturally. The /privacy page describes what telemetry is captured and what it isn't.

The page regenerates on every visit; the data is current to within the last polling window. There is no editorial step.

Historical archive: each ISO week is a stable URL. Last week (2026-W27) →