Human review
The warm center. A person evaluates each flag and retains responsibility for the decision.
ObservatoryControlled evaluation · synthetic states onlyStep inside the review.
Explore the Review architecture as a living system: Human review at the center, four review lenses in orbit, reviewer provenance on every lens, and the source model held outside the reviewer boundary.
Controlled evaluation previewSynthetic states onlyZero production records displayedZero client records displayed
Composing the system: review lenses, model provenance, and controlled states…
System key
How to read the system.
Every visible object has one defined meaning. Motion adds perspective, not proof.
Four review lenses
Evidence, fiduciary and conflicts, risk and suitability, and alternatives and tradeoffs.
Reviewer provenance
Each moon identifies the model assigned to that lens under the current policy.
Controlled states
The belt visualizes eight synthetic control states, not production activity or customer outcomes.
Excluded source model
The source model remains outside the reviewer boundary and is not assigned a review lens.
Perspective and sequence
Change the camera or scrub the sequence. The underlying controlled dataset does not change.
Evidence register
Eight states. Nothing implied between them.
The register is the accessible counterpart to the orbital belt. Select points in the scene or read every state here.
System boundary
Source vendor excluded
The source vendor is removed before reviewer assignment and checked again in the completed schema.
Evidence & grounding
Unsupported claim surfaced
A controlled case produces a flag-form evidence finding for human review without making a legal conclusion.
Evidence & grounding
Calculation recomputed
A suspected calculation issue is reproduced from supplied inputs before it remains categorized as a math error.
Evidence & grounding
Math correction withheld
When inputs or conventions do not support rigorous recomputation, the engine abstains and moves the uncertainty to reviewer questions.
System boundary
Incomplete review rejected
A missing required lens or insufficient reviewer-vendor diversity does not produce a completed review.
Fiduciary & conflicts
Conflict disclosure flagged
The lens states the factual disclosure gap and supporting context for a person to evaluate; it does not determine a breach.
System boundary
Human disposition recorded
Each synthetic finding receives one disposition and written basis before the record can be constructed.
System boundary
Review record constructed
The controlled workflow reaches a reviewer-attested record only after disposition and final-decision consistency checks.
Interpretation boundary
What this view does not establish.
The visualization makes the implemented architecture inspectable. It does not turn activity into proof.
- The scene contains controlled synthetic evaluation states, not production activity or customer outcomes.
- Vendor separation does not establish statistical independence or eliminate correlated failure.
- Event visibility does not establish model accuracy, finding completeness, or regulatory sufficiency.
- No client text, reviewer identity, firm identity, source prompt, or filed record is displayed.
Dataset · controlled synthetic evaluationPolicy · review-2026-07-11.10Schema · teranode.observatory.v1Reviewer vendors · 3